|
Dear Reader,
Two weeks ago, I gave a speech "A New Map for a New Age" to an audience at the German Chamber and also to a larger audience (approx. 200 people) at the HR Directors' Forum in Hong Kong.
From the immediate feedback I got, I conclude that I must have hit a nerve with my audiences. An increasing number of senior managers and HR professionals realize that in order to substantially improve retention and engagement, some leadership training or merely higher salaries and boni won't do the job.
However, in order to achieve long lasting and substantial improvement in these areas, the top management must be ready to go for the long haul of a corporate culture change. Such projects typically last from at least one year up to 4-5 years, depending on the current cultural disposition of the organization.
If you'd like to receive the PDF of my presentation, drop me an email to
charlie.lang@progressu.com and I'll be happy to send it to you.
Let's keep progressing!
Charlie Lang
Executive Coach and Founder of Progress-U Ltd.
Author of The Groupness Factor
From the coach's bench: Success means rethinking attitude
By Charlie Lang, Managing Partner of Progress-U Ltd.
Executive Coach & Trainer, Book Author & Professional Speaker
Published in SCMP Classified Post on 15th March 2008
 Download this article
 Martin, the regional HR director of a European multinational electronics company, is considered by his chief executive Jeffrey as one of his top performers in the Asia-Pacific region. Jeffrey told me he would like to make Martin his successor when he retired in a couple of years.
Recently, however, complaints about Martin's leadership style have been mounting from several HR managers who reported to him. They find Martin's style too pushy and as a result do not feel sufficiently respected.
I suggested to Jeffrey that it would be useful that I first talked to some HR managers to get a better understanding of what was going on before starting the coaching assignment with him.
What I learned from the feedback from Martin's direct reports was quite interesting. Some of the HR managers felt that Martin's communication style was very blunt and they often were not 100 per cent sure about Martin's expectations. Apparently there was also a language issue because some managers said Martin's English was often confusing. They were also unhappy with how Martin dealt with unmet expectations. Martin would resort to impolite language and frequently scream at them.
When I asked about what they appreciated in Martin, they responded that they liked his drive, honesty, commitment to the company and abundant energy.
When I met Martin he appeared to be a friendly and polite person. Also, I had no problems in communicating with him in English. I was not surprised about the contradiction between the reports from his subordinates and his behaviour towards me. It is quite common.
What it tells me is that Martin does not have a problem in communicating appropriately. It seemed to be more a question of his beliefs about what is useful when communicating with his direct reports.
This assumption was confirmed when I asked him about whether he felt that his communication style with his direct reports worked. He responded: "You know, I need to get the job done and I expect my direct reports to do their job at a high-quality level and within the given timelines. If they don't do that, they have to accept a rather rough response from me. It teaches them a lesson to be more careful next time. I understand that this doesn't make them happy, but my job is not to make them happy but to make sure we get results. If they can't take that, they are not ready for this kind of job."
It was obvious that Martin thought he did the right thing, and that his style of communication was one of the reasons for his success.
Martin's communication style and the fact that he is successful is a mere correlation, but Martin believes that his communication style leads to good results. It is not unusual that successful people mix up correlation with causality.
To address this, Martin first needed to understand what really made him successful. Eventually he realised that the main reasons for his success were his determination, his hard work and his high energy level. He understood that his communication style led to a limitation in his success because there was a high turnover rate in his team.
When Martin became aware of these dynamics, he was ready to rethink his attitude towards his direct reports and develop more empathy and respect towards them. He was also ready to improve the clarity of his communication by asking more often if his expectations were clearly understood.
Martin actually had all the skills to communicate more successfully with his direct reports. Once his beliefs shifted, he started to develop a more appropriate attitude towards his team members.
For more information related to Progress-U Leadership Training and Coaching, please click here.
For more information about the author of this articles click here. |
