|
Dear Reader,
Last week, my fellow coach and comunication expert Alan Steward presented to me in my function as the president of the Hong Kong International Coaching Community the idea to bring two gentlemen, Messrs. Lucas Pawlik and Tom Cook, to Hong Kong.
Lucas and Tom were fascinated by the findings of Heinz von Foerster, often referred to as the "father of 2nd order cybernetics" and want to bring Foerster's philosophy to a wider audience.
I understood quickly how closely related Foerster's philosophy is with the coaching mindset and how it would be useful for literally anyone who wants or needs to influence other people more effectively. I'll keep you posted on the progress of this initiative.
Today's article fits perfectly with Foerster's philosophy who said:
Take it or leave it.
I don't want to sell anything to anyone.
I don't want to persuade any human being.
I only want to draw attention.
The only thing I want is to draw attention.
Heinz von Foerster
The case stated in my article is a case in point which shows how effective this approach can be.
Let’s keep progressing!
Charlie Lang
Executive Coach and Founder of Progress-U Ltd.
Author of The Groupness Factor
From the coach's bench: Answers to problems lie within you
By Charlie Lang, Managing Partner of Progress-U Ltd.
Executive Coach & Trainer, Book Author & Professional Speaker
Published in SCMP Classified Post on 1st March 2008
 Download this article
 Andrea, Asia-Pacific's regional sales director of a United States-based technology company, was coached before when she was stationed in the US. Having seen the advantages, she decided to commission me when she encountered difficulty in her job.
To make a long story short, although as the head of sales she was able to achieve her top-line turnover targets, margins were on the decline. Subsequently, bottom-line profit targets fell short and she received feedback from her boss, the regional CEO, that her performance was unsatisfactory.
The focus of my coaching assignment was to help her find out why margins were on the decline and to fix this.
When I asked her why she thought margins were going down, she was quick to point out that her salespeople in the region were not tough enough as negotiators, and sealed deals at prices that were too low.
She also said that competition in certain countries was extremely tough, and price dumping was not unheard of.
Having been a sales director and vice-president of sales myself for several years, it would have been easy for me to jump into "consulting mode" and give her advice on what she could do to improve the situation. However, as a coach, it is not my job to give advice but to help my clients achieve higher levels of self-awareness and understanding so that they can make the best possible choices.
Also, in this case, I noticed that Andrea had the mindset of a victim. Unless I could make her take responsibility for the situation, it would be difficult for her to reflect inwardly and come up with good ideas on how to improve the margins.
As a coach, I usually use a three-step process.
- Appreciate or acknowledge my client's way of thinking. Opposing it, usually, only makes the person defensive.
- Make her imagine what the ideal situation would look like. This focuses her mind on the optimal outcome and creates positive energy.
- Ask her to define the gap between the ideal and real situations in detail, and what she can do to help bridge this gap.
Andrea started to realise that she was part of the problem because she pushed hard to achieve the sales targets, which gave the frontline salespeople the wrong message - "sales volume before margin".
Also, Andrea noticed that she needed to provide more support to frontline staff for them to better understand her company's value proposition and why customers should pay a higher price than what their competitors were charging.
She finally took responsibility for the situation and more importantly, for shaping the future of her region's sales development.
As a consultant, my advice would have been similar to the ideas she came up with. Also, the process of determining what needs to be done would have been considerably shorter.
So is coaching a waste of time in such situations? I don't believe so.
Andrea now has full ownership over her ideas, making her much more passionate about implementing them than if the same ideas came from my advice.
Had I used the consulting approach, Andrea would most probably still have been stuck in a victim mindset and, as a result, might not really drive for change.
Andrea's ideas are tailored exactly to her situation, while my ideas, although similar, would have been more generic and less specifically suited.
The secret of high-impact coaching lies in this principle of ownership by a party being coached.
In contrast, in training or teaching, ownership lies with the trainer or teacher instead of the trainee or student.
For more information related to Progress-U Leadership Training and Coaching, please click here.
For more information about the author of this articles click here. |
